Untitled Document
Excercise and NutritionWellnessHeart DiseaseHeart SurgeryAsk the NursePDf Health LibraryGlossaryLinks
About WHFPrograms & Events
   

Refuting the Myths about Resuscitation

The latest knowledge in resuscitation science guides AED/CPR programs and training

By Greg Slusser



Jan 01, 2012 - Just as in any medical field, researchers in resuscitation science continually search for new knowledge that can lead to better patient care. In the workplace, the latest discoveries in resuscitation science can be applied to CPR training and to automated external defibrillators (AEDs) used to treat victims of sudden cardiac arrest. Untreated sudden cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death in occupational settings, according to OSHA, with the agency estimating about 10,000 sudden cardiac arrests occur at work each year.

To communicate the latest knowledge about resuscitation for application in emergency situations, the American Heart Association (AHA) in 2010 updated its Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science for implementation in 2011.

In these most recent guidelines, AHA emphasizes the importance of chest compressions at a rate of 100 per minute. This "hands only" method of providing CPR was recommended after medical studies demonstrated that fast, 2-inch deep chest compressions to adult victims are associated with survival with good neurologic function. While the 30:2 ratio of chest compressions to rescue breaths is still recommended, the emphasis now is on initiating chest compressions before rescue breathing, delivering them without interruption, and allowing full chest recoil after each compression.

Another guideline that often goes unnoticed is that the AED should be used as soon as possible, rather than after CPR. Previous guidelines directed rescuers to provide one and a half to three minutes of CPR before placing the AED pads on the victim. "Shock first" is now recommended because "speed to shock" is associated with higher survival rates. About 90 percent of sudden cardiac arrest victims shocked within the first few minutes after arrest survive, and survival rates decline with each passing minute. Only about 10 percent of victims shocked after 10 minutes survive.

The guidelines help to further refute a few common myths of sudden cardiac arrest, CPR, and AEDs still alive in many workplaces.


Myth 1: CPR alone can save a sudden cardiac arrest victim. CPR should be provided only until the time an AED is available because only an AED can determine whether or not a patient's heart is arrhythmic and provide defibrillation. CPR alone cannot save a sudden cardiac arrest's victim's life; it can only buy time.

Myth 2: An AED is not needed; just call EMS. While EMS personnel have the knowledge and tools needed to save a sudden cardiac arrest victim, they often simply cannot reach the victim quickly enough. According to a USA Today investigative report, EMS responders usually take from six to 12 minutes to treat a sudden cardiac arrest victim. For the best chance of survival, a victim should be treated in less than three to five minutes. Most untreated sudden cardiac arrest victims die within 10 minutes.

Myth 3: AEDs malfunction often. The Food and Drug Administration has recognized the effectiveness of AEDs in saving lives. According to The New York Times, Dr. Bram D. Zuckerman, director of the division of cardiovascular devices in the FDA Office of Device Evaluation, said that "there's no question these are life-sustaining, life-saving devices." The number of device malfunctions is small compared to the number of the times AEDs are used without malfunction or to save a sudden cardiac arrest victim's life. An estimated 15,000 to 20,000 Americans have their lives saved by an AED each year.

Myth 4: AEDs are complicated instruments that are difficult to use. A University of Washington study demonstrated that the average sixth grader can operate an AED successfully. Non-medical volunteers, including workplace response teams, represent the largest group of people using AEDs, according to a study by the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. Indeed, several scientific studies have demonstrated that public-access AEDs used by non-medical responders are increasing the numbers of sudden cardiac arrest survivors more than any other kind of medical intervention.

Recent Medical Studies Drove Changes
Before the publication of the 2005 AHA Guidelines for CPR and ECC, two studies suggested a potential benefit of providing CPR before providing a shock with an AED. However, prior to the publication of the 2010 guidelines, two newer studies found that CPR prior to defibrillation was not associated with a higher survival rate. And in August 2011, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that extending the time CPR was provided prior to AED treatment did not improve outcomes.

In many real-life rescue situations, one rescuer can provide CPR while another person retrieves the AED. In this way, CPR can still be provided pre-shock without delaying the speed to shock. Rescuers should initiate chest compressions before giving rescue breaths, following the 100 compressions per minute and 30:2 ratio of compressions to rescue breaths, the guidelines advise.



Reprinted with permission from the January 2012 issue of Occupational Health & Safety, 1105 Media Inc. The author is director of sales for Defibtech AED

-- end --

 

   

WHF  |  Our Sponsors |  Press Room |  History |  Volunteering  |  Organization Chart  | 

Back to top

Disclaimer | Donate Now | Contact Us | Site Map | Store


1999-2000; updates: 2002, 2004, 2005, 2007 Women's Heart Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The information contained in this Women's Heart Foundation (WHF) Web site is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment, and WHF recommends consultation with your doctor or health care professional.